|
tech
newsgroups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Re: My Windows XP looks like Windows 98! Graphics changed on their ow> Did you disable the Themes service? This (misguided) advice is Themes was a dirty word in Windows 98 days due to the performance> sometimes > offered as a way to improve a computer's performance. Or have you used > a > registry cleaner? > overhead and lack of stability that one experienced when enabling it. The difference with today's computers are that they have much more powerful processors and much more RAM. Have you ever used a stop watch to compare the time that a computer boots with Themes disabled versus without? Give it a go and you'll realize why this "feature" is disabled by default in Windows 2003! I have done extensive testing of the Themes Service in a Terminal Services environment using HP LoadRunner and have demonstrated conclusively that: * Back-end systems performance is degraded (50% less users). * The session experience is degraded (more bandwidth = more $$$$ and even then it's still pretty slow). * Colors and sizes of menu bars do not:) consistently appear. The size may vary as can the color (i.e. inconsistent user experience). Makes me wonder about just how important this all is? After all, we had decades of Windows development without the Themes service! Alas, in Vista if you disable it then you lose your Aero interface and everything ends up looking really awful! -- Bennopia Themes on, themes off...I can't tell the difference. No improvement in
computer speed that I can measure. --- Leonard Grey Errare humanum est Bennopia wrote: Show quote > Leonard Grey;7911549 Wrote: >> Did you disable the Themes service? This (misguided) advice is >> sometimes >> offered as a way to improve a computer's performance. Or have you used >> a >> registry cleaner? >> > > Themes was a dirty word in Windows 98 days due to the performance > overhead and lack of stability that one experienced when enabling it. > The difference with today's computers are that they have much more > powerful processors and much more RAM. > > Have you ever used a stop watch to compare the time that a computer > boots with Themes disabled versus without? Give it a go and you'll > realize why this "feature" is disabled by default in Windows 2003! > > I have done extensive testing of the Themes Service in a Terminal > Services environment using HP LoadRunner and have demonstrated > conclusively that: > * Back-end systems performance is degraded (50% less users). > * The session experience is degraded (more bandwidth = more $$$$ and > even then it's still pretty slow). > * Colors and sizes of menu bars do not:) consistently appear. The > size may vary as can the color (i.e. inconsistent user experience). > > Makes me wonder about just how important this all is? After all, we > had decades of Windows development without the Themes service! > > Alas, in Vista if you disable it then you lose your Aero interface and > everything ends up looking really awful! > > |
|||||||||||||||||||||||