|
tech
newsgroups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
need regedit for a faster printerI am looking for a regedit to speed up a printer problem in windows xp home.
I know that a regedit exist to limit the amount of time the computer waits to send printer information to a printer. I know that all print information goes through a que spooler even though you specify direct to printer and raw format. The 10 second delay is very annoying especially when I am printing information on forms that have where there are 3 distict forms on the tractor feed paper within the sive of a normal piece of paper. I sometimes hit the tear button to get the form before the last item prints due to the delay. I know this regedit exist because I had it before but right now I lost it due to the computer crashing and being reloaded. Any help would be appreciated Try switching youre printer from the printer port to usb,it will take 1/4 of
the time...regedit deals with the OS files/software in xp Show quote "robert lipsett" wrote: > I am looking for a regedit to speed up a printer problem in windows xp home. > I know that a regedit exist to limit the amount of time the computer waits > to send printer information to a printer. I know that all print information > goes through a que spooler even though you specify direct to printer and raw > format. The 10 second delay is very annoying especially when I am printing > information on forms that have where there are 3 distict forms on the > tractor feed paper within the sive of a normal piece of paper. I sometimes > hit the tear button to get the form before the last item prints due to the > delay. I know this regedit exist because I had it before but right now I > lost it due to the computer crashing and being reloaded. Any help would be > appreciated > that is not an option due to the fact that the software I am using is
written to only output to the lpt connection and my printer is only lpt capable ( dot matrix printer) robert lipsett wrote :
> I am looking for a regedit to speed up a printer problem in windows xp home. Sounds to me you are running an old DOS application:> I know that a regedit exist to limit the amount of time the computer waits > to send printer information to a printer. I know that all print information > goes through a que spooler even though you specify direct to printer and raw > format. The 10 second delay is very annoying especially when I am printing > information on forms that have where there are 3 distict forms on the > tractor feed paper within the sive of a normal piece of paper. I sometimes > hit the tear button to get the form before the last item prints due to the > delay. I know this regedit exist because I had it before but right now I > lost it due to the computer crashing and being reloaded. Any help would be > appreciated http://www.google.com/search?q=xp+spooler+timeout+dos -- /klaus robert lipsett wrote :
> thanks for the link it looks like what I need Please note that if your application supports printing to a file named LPT1 instead of directly to the physical port LPT1, is a much better solution to your problem. -- /klaus On Fri, 12 Oct 2007 22:43:18 +0200, Klaus Jorgensen <kj@no.spam>
wrote: > robert lipsett wrote : Please note that LPT1 is a reserved name in DOS and Windows and can> > thanks for the link it looks like what I need > > Please note that if your application supports printing to a file named > LPT1 instead of directly to the physical port LPT1, is a much better > solution to your problem. *not* be used for a file name. It has nothing to do with whether the application supports it. -- Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP Windows - Shell/User Please Reply to the Newsgroup Ken Blake, MVP wrote :
> On Fri, 12 Oct 2007 22:43:18 +0200, Klaus Jorgensen <kj@no.spam> Yep - writing to a device name does not create a typical file on a > wrote: > >> robert lipsett wrote : >>> thanks for the link it looks like what I need >> >> Please note that if your application supports printing to a file named >> LPT1 instead of directly to the physical port LPT1, is a much better >> solution to your problem. > > Please note that LPT1 is a reserved name in DOS and Windows and can > *not* be used for a file name. It has nothing to do with whether the > application supports it. drive. An application writing to a "file" does not distinguish between a real file name and a reserved device name. The DOS copy command is an example of this (e.g. "copy filename.txt lpt1"). For DOS applications there are usually two ways of outputting print data: 1. To a file (in this case a device name called LPT1) 2. Directly to the printer (via the BIOS or a hardware I/O-port) Windows grabs both of them. Using method [1], Windows knows when a print job is finished, and begins printing immediately. In method [2], the DOS application sends data without indicating an end of job, so Windows does not know if the application is still computing print data or if the print job is actually finished. In a multitasking environment it must know this before sending data to the printer - that's why it waits for about 15 seconds before assuming an end of the print job. -- /klaus |
|||||||||||||||||||||||