|
tech
newsgroups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
how to implement multi-IP address, or multi-interface, or a virtual tcp/ip driver in Windos XP withI have only one network adapter, and need to access 2 networks in LAN at the
same time using Windows XP professional. Their IDs look like this 192.168.0.x(255.255.255.0) and 192.168.10.x(255.255.255.0). How can I do this? Thanks Peter You can buy another cheap Nic for $15 dollars and avoid the whole "twisted"
issue. Show quote "peter" <pe***@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:uUkhQjyEFHA.3780@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl... > I have only one network adapter, and need to access 2 networks in LAN at the > same time using Windows XP professional. Their IDs look like this > 192.168.0.x(255.255.255.0) and 192.168.10.x(255.255.255.0). How can I do > this? > > Thanks > > Peter > > > You can buy another cheap Nic for $15 dollars and avoid the whole "twisted"
issue. Show quote "peter" <pe***@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:uUkhQjyEFHA.3780@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl... > I have only one network adapter, and need to access 2 networks in LAN at the > same time using Windows XP professional. Their IDs look like this > 192.168.0.x(255.255.255.0) and 192.168.10.x(255.255.255.0). How can I do > this? > > Thanks > > Peter > > > Static IP address, enter the addresses as desired.
Phillip Windell wrote: Show quote > You can buy another cheap Nic for $15 dollars and avoid the whole "twisted" > issue. > > > He's asking about adding a second IP# that is not part of the same subnet.
IP#s on a Nic are supposed to be all from the same subnet because all of the other TCP/IP settings are "global" for the entire Nic and apply to every IP# running on it. You may get "lucky" if they both happen to be using the same subnet mask (although I'd still never do it), but if they use a different mask you are screwed because you can only have one mask per Nic. Show quote "Bob I" <bire***@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:42136AAB.7040004@yahoo.com... > Static IP address, enter the addresses as desired. > > Phillip Windell wrote: > > > You can buy another cheap Nic for $15 dollars and avoid the whole "twisted" > > issue. > > > > > > > Static IP address, enter the addresses as desired.
Phillip Windell wrote: Show quote > You can buy another cheap Nic for $15 dollars and avoid the whole "twisted" > issue. > > > He's asking about adding a second IP# that is not part of the same subnet.
IP#s on a Nic are supposed to be all from the same subnet because all of the other TCP/IP settings are "global" for the entire Nic and apply to every IP# running on it. You may get "lucky" if they both happen to be using the same subnet mask (although I'd still never do it), but if they use a different mask you are screwed because you can only have one mask per Nic. Show quote "Bob I" <bire***@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:42136AAB.7040004@yahoo.com... > Static IP address, enter the addresses as desired. > > Phillip Windell wrote: > > > You can buy another cheap Nic for $15 dollars and avoid the whole "twisted" > > issue. > > > > > > > No, in alternative tab of TCP property dlg you can add additional IP/subnet
masks for multihome computer Arkady Show quote "Phillip Windell" <@.> wrote in message news:%23Nbn3ZEFFHA.464@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl... > He's asking about adding a second IP# that is not part of the same subnet. > IP#s on a Nic are supposed to be all from the same subnet because all of > the > other TCP/IP settings are "global" for the entire Nic and apply to every > IP# > running on it. You may get "lucky" if they both happen to be using the > same > subnet mask (although I'd still never do it), but if they use a different > mask you are screwed because you can only have one mask per Nic. > > > -- > > Phillip Windell [MCP, MVP, CCNA] > www.wandtv.com > > > "Bob I" <bire***@yahoo.com> wrote in message > news:42136AAB.7040004@yahoo.com... >> Static IP address, enter the addresses as desired. >> >> Phillip Windell wrote: >> >> > You can buy another cheap Nic for $15 dollars and avoid the whole > "twisted" >> > issue. >> > >> > >> > >> > > "Arkady Frenkel" <arka***@hotmailxdotx.com> wrote in message Ah! You're right. Sorry. But I still would avoid it. Running two IPnews:ubw0QgMFFHA.2608@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl... > No, in alternative tab of TCP property dlg you can add additional IP/subnet > masks for multihome computer > Arkady Networks on the same wire just isnt a very good idea. There should be a law against it,...it's like a guy wereing a dress or something,...it should be defined as a "act of terrorism" maybe. No, in alternative tab of TCP property dlg you can add additional IP/subnet
masks for multihome computer Arkady Show quote "Phillip Windell" <@.> wrote in message news:%23Nbn3ZEFFHA.464@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl... > He's asking about adding a second IP# that is not part of the same subnet. > IP#s on a Nic are supposed to be all from the same subnet because all of > the > other TCP/IP settings are "global" for the entire Nic and apply to every > IP# > running on it. You may get "lucky" if they both happen to be using the > same > subnet mask (although I'd still never do it), but if they use a different > mask you are screwed because you can only have one mask per Nic. > > > -- > > Phillip Windell [MCP, MVP, CCNA] > www.wandtv.com > > > "Bob I" <bire***@yahoo.com> wrote in message > news:42136AAB.7040004@yahoo.com... >> Static IP address, enter the addresses as desired. >> >> Phillip Windell wrote: >> >> > You can buy another cheap Nic for $15 dollars and avoid the whole > "twisted" >> > issue. >> > >> > >> > >> > > Agree with you , but XP by itself give such opportunity called bridge option
( in Advanced menu of Network connections ) Arkady Show quote "Phillip Windell" <@.> wrote in message news:OJtAwDQFFHA.2564@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl... > "Arkady Frenkel" <arka***@hotmailxdotx.com> wrote in message > news:ubw0QgMFFHA.2608@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl... >> No, in alternative tab of TCP property dlg you can add additional > IP/subnet >> masks for multihome computer >> Arkady > > Ah! You're right. Sorry. But I still would avoid it. Running two IP > Networks on the same wire just isnt a very good idea. There should be a > law > against it,...it's like a guy wereing a dress or something,...it should be > defined as a "act of terrorism" maybe. > > -- > > Phillip Windell [MCP, MVP, CCNA] > www.wandtv.com > > "Arkady Frenkel" <arka***@hotmailxdotx.com> wrote in message Ah! You're right. Sorry. But I still would avoid it. Running two IPnews:ubw0QgMFFHA.2608@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl... > No, in alternative tab of TCP property dlg you can add additional IP/subnet > masks for multihome computer > Arkady Networks on the same wire just isnt a very good idea. There should be a law against it,...it's like a guy wereing a dress or something,...it should be defined as a "act of terrorism" maybe. Agree with you , but XP by itself give such opportunity called bridge option
( in Advanced menu of Network connections ) Arkady Show quote "Phillip Windell" <@.> wrote in message news:OJtAwDQFFHA.2564@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl... > "Arkady Frenkel" <arka***@hotmailxdotx.com> wrote in message > news:ubw0QgMFFHA.2608@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl... >> No, in alternative tab of TCP property dlg you can add additional > IP/subnet >> masks for multihome computer >> Arkady > > Ah! You're right. Sorry. But I still would avoid it. Running two IP > Networks on the same wire just isnt a very good idea. There should be a > law > against it,...it's like a guy wereing a dress or something,...it should be > defined as a "act of terrorism" maybe. > > -- > > Phillip Windell [MCP, MVP, CCNA] > www.wandtv.com > > "Arkady Frenkel" <arka***@hotmailxdotx.com> wrote in message Well, yea,..but that isn't the same thing. That would be two Nics in thenews:eDa69UyFFHA.3368@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl... > Agree with you , but XP by itself give such opportunity called bridge option > ( in Advanced menu of Network connections ) > Arkady same subnet, not two IP#s from different subnets ont he same Nic. Of course I don't like this "bridging stuff" they came up with (XP & 2003) either,...there are too many better ways to do things like that. "Arkady Frenkel" <arka***@hotmailxdotx.com> wrote in message Well, yea,..but that isn't the same thing. That would be two Nics in thenews:eDa69UyFFHA.3368@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl... > Agree with you , but XP by itself give such opportunity called bridge option > ( in Advanced menu of Network connections ) > Arkady same subnet, not two IP#s from different subnets ont he same Nic. Of course I don't like this "bridging stuff" they came up with (XP & 2003) either,...there are too many better ways to do things like that.  |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Other interesting topics